CONTENTS:


 
Membership

 Donation Form


 Photo Gallery

 Air Stations

 Reunions

 Special Articles

 Other Sites

 Contact Us

 


BULLHORN #52
6 September
2009

ANAers – Again, lots in the news, with the 100TH Anniversary of Naval Aviation (CoNA) leading off with a letter from the Commander, Naval Air Forces to the Association.   

Lots of other news follows -  Aviation Flag Officer moves, unmanned vehicles, carrier inventories and rework, F-35  - the list just goes on -  

For those who will be attending the Tailhook Association Reunion this coming week, please stop by the ANA booth to say, “Hi!” to our Editor Zip Rausa and me….we’d love to see you and have the opportunity to discuss ANA. 

Please remember this is the new format – just use point at the article you want to see, select CONTROL (CTRL) and mouse click –

Dutch

 

BULLHORN #52 contents:

Centennial of Naval Aviation

F-35 Refueling Trials

Jetfuel From Seawater Uranium

Don't Reduce American Carrier Strength

Possible Problem For Hornets

New Unmanned Helicopter To Go Into Active Duty

Rebuilding Carriers

The Next Naval Aviation Revolution

Radar Upgrade Kits for USMC F/A-18D

T-6 TEXAN to Whiting

CNO Announces Flag Officer Assignments

Gates Assures Lockheed Of Military's Backing

Navy Discussing 2014 IOC For Joint Strike Fighter Carrier Variant

E-6B Mercury Aircraft To Undergo Refit

Enterprise Crew Certification

BJ Penn Retires After More than Four Decades of Service

 

100TH Anniversary of Naval Aviation

The Commander, Naval Air Forces has written the Association of Naval Aviation to announce the coming 100th Anniversary of Naval Aviation in 2011 and to provide details of some current and planned events.  The cited address (URL) for the Centennial of Naval Aviation web site is incorrect.  It is http://centennial.ahf.nmci.navy.mil/.  Unfortunately, many parts of the web site are vacant.  However, that is sure to be temporary so please do ‘bookmark’ the address and go back to it in the future for good gouge on the 100th, the CoNA.

C:\Documents and Settings\Dutch Rauch\My Documents\1ANA\100th Anniversary of Naval Aviation\LTR CNAF to Pres ANA CONA 080409.TIF

 

F-35 Refueling Trials

The last BULLHORN carried an article about the F-35 doing refueling trials – Thanks to San Diego Commanding Officer John Fry for sending this photo of that event.

F-35 refueling from a KC-130.JPG

   

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

US Navy Aims To Make Jetfuel From Seawater Uranium

(THE REGISTER (UK) 20 AUG 09) ... Lewis Page

Coverage of recent US Navy research into producing jet fuel from CO2 and hydrogen has been widely reported under headlines such as "making jet fuel from seawater".

The coverage illustrates not only declining modern understanding of science and technology, but also the sad eclipse of proper science fiction by vampire-lust fantasies.

The stories arise from a paper presented at the weekend by Robert Dorner and colleagues at the Naval Research Laboratory. According to the Navy boffins:

The impact CO2 is having on the environment has been thoroughly documented over the last years. Many different technologies have been proposed to reduce its impact on global warming such as geological sequestration. However, an interesting and attractive alternative would be the recycling of the gas into energy-rich molecules.

Dorner and Co have been working on mixing CO2 and hydrogen to produce light hydrocarbons which could then be processed into jet fuel. As jet fuel is rich in energy, doing this uses a lot of energy - and even then, a lot of the CO2 and hydrogen actually turns to methane. Methane can actually be a useful fuel, but not as useful as jetfuel - and as a waste product it's far more damaging to the environment than carbon dioxide, being a hugely more powerful greenhouse gas.

But Dorner and his colleagues have managed to get the amount of methane produced down to 30 per cent or so, using special catalysts. The "sea water" bit comes from the fact that Dorner has also noted that there's a fair bit of CO2 in sea water, plus hydrogen too if you have even more energy to crack water molecules apart.

If you were interested in being green, and had a whole load of energy which you considered green and wanted to make liquid fuel with, you probably wouldn't bother harvesting your CO2 from the sea - you'd get it from coal power stations or other hydrocarbon-burning powerplant exhausts. Such ideas are already commonly touted among researchers.

Enormous amounts of cheap carbon-free power aren't normally to be had, however, which is why such ideas remain mainly notional.

They aren't quite as notional for the US Navy, however. That's because US Navy aircraft carriers have powerful nuclear reactors aboard, potentially able to supply large amounts of energy if the ship wasn't going at full speed and launching planes (the reactors power the catapults as well as the ship's props).

As a result the primary limiting factor on how long a US carrier can keep flying its planes is actually the amount of jet fuel it can carry. The reactor's uranium lasts for years.

Thus it would actually be useful if you could build a plant on a carrier which could scoop CO2 out of the water, crack hydrogen from it too, and combine these to top off the ship's jet-fuel tanks. The carrier would be able to keep dominating airspace without needing to break off and replenish its supplies so often.

That's how Dorner may have presented the ideas to his bosses at the navy lab, perhaps. But when speaking to people concerned primarily about the environment, it's generally seen as silly to start mentioning nuclear power.

But there aren't really any other options for processes like this. Making synthetic liquid hydrocarbon fuels always consumes a lot more energy than you could get by burning the fuel, so it's mostly witless to make them using fossil power. (The US military is interested in making jet fuel using coal, but this is merely because America has a lot of coal mines and potentially not enough oil wells. The Germans who developed such processes originally did so for similar reasons.)

 

Return to index

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 

Don't Reduce American Carrier Strength

(ST. LOIUS POST-DISPATCH 20 AUG 09) ... Paul Rohrer

Hot on the heels of President Barack Obama canceling the Air Force's most advanced strike fighter, the Congressional Research Service (CRS) announced this week that we now face a much greater shortfall in Navy and Marine Corps strike fighters than was previously estimated. Last year, CRS predicted a shortfall of 125 Navy fighter jets by 2017. They now predict that the shortfall will be more than 300 jets.

The American people deserve to understand what those shortages really mean.

On the surface, the president's defense budget calls for cutting the Navy's aircraft carrier strike groups from 11 to 10. But a closer inspection reveals that Obama's program delays and budget cuts will do terrible harm to the readiness and capability of our carrier groups.

Although America does have 10 carrier groups, we cannot deploy all 10 at any given time. Both personnel and equipment require shore time for maintenance, rest, and training. Along with the carrier groups that are temporarily rotated out of service, the worsening shortage of fighter aircraft is reducing the number of ready carrier groups even further.

Obama's defense budget is cutting back production of F-18 Hornets and Super Hornets _ the Navy's top fighter aircraft _ long before the new F-35 Joint Strike Fighter is ready to deploy. Conservative estimates are that the new F-35 won't be operational for another six years, leading to what CRS now estimates to be a 300-plane shortfall.

A carrier group typically sails with 50 strike fighters on board. If the F-18 inventory shortfall climbs from 125 to 300, as the CRS now predicts, then you have a shortage of six carrier groups worth of jets.

Submitting a budget to Congress that simply ignores an anticipated shortage of six aircraft carriers worth of fighters, to put it mildly, is no way to provide for fleet readiness.

Rendering our carrier strike groups unready for deployment will leave America less capable of defending ourselves and our allies against rogue nations around the world. And, such a show of weakness unnecessarily encourages adversaries to test our will.

(Paul Rohrer of McLean, Va., served in the U.S. Navy for more than four decades before retiring as a Rear Admiral.)

Return to index

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 

Mishaps Point To Possible Problem For Hornets

(NAVY TIMES 19 AUG 09) ... Andrew Tilghman

The Navy suffered two major mishaps involving F/A-18 Hornets in early August, both suggesting problems with the jets’ airflow system and one resulting in an engine fire.

Both mishaps prompted emergency landings after indications of a failed bleed air system, which can cause an engine fire or cut the cockpit’s oxygen supply.

Lt. Callie Ferrari, a Navy spokeswoman at the Pentagon, said the mishaps were under investigation and it was “premature to speculate” about whether the mishaps were related or whether the Navy plans any inspections. No injuries were reported.

The bleed air system siphons compressed air from the engine system and redirects it for uses that can include pressurizing the cockpit or de-icing wings.

In the first mishap, an F/A-18A+ Hornet made an emergency landing in San Diego on Aug. 7 after the cockpit’s control panel showed dual bleed air warning lights.

The plane, which was assigned to Strike Fighter Squadron 204 based at Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base New Orleans, landed safely at Marine Corps Air Station Miramar, said Lt. Adam Bashaw, a spokesman for Naval Reserve Forces.

The incident was initially listed as a Class A mishap, meaning it resulted in more than $1 million in damage. It was later downgraded to a Class B, suggesting the repair costs will exceed $200,000, Bashaw said.

The nature of the damage and the cause of the air-system warning remain under investigation, Bashaw said.

F/A-18A+ Hornets are single-seat aircraft with an upgraded radar system.

In the second, an F/A-18F Super Hornet made an emergency landing in central California on Aug. 13 after a fire erupted in the starboard engine, said Lt. Glenn Sircy, a Navy spokesman with Naval Air Forces, Pacific.

The pilot’s control panel showed an engine fire and also flashed a bleed air warning light, Sircy said.

The plane landed safely at Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake shortly before noon. It was assigned to Strike Fighter Squadron 122, at Naval Air Station Lemoore, Calif.

The plane was conducting a familiarization flight, Sircy said. VFA-122 is the West Coast’s fleet replacement squadron for Super Hornets.

Return to index

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 

New Unmanned Helicopter To Go Into Active Duty

(10 NEWS (SAN DIEGO) 20 AUG 09)

SAN DIEGO -- The newest addition to the military's unmanned aerial arsenal is a pilotless helicopter and, as 10News reporter Bob Lawrence found out, the machine has a San Diego connection and is about to go on active duty.

The latest in military technology is an un-manned helicopter called the Fire Scout. Developed by Northrop-Grumman in San Diego, it is about to go to sea on the war on drugs.

Unmanned aerial vehicles aren't new but what makes this 22-foot-long, 9-foot-high UAV different is that it's a helicopter and it doesn't require a pilot to fly it.

"The mission is pre-programmed into the aircraft and it flies the mission," John VanBrabant of Northrop-Grumman said. "It takes off, flies the mission and lands automatically."

Operators can override the program and change the flight if called for.

The Fire Scout is assembled at a plant in Moss Point, Miss., but critical componant testing is done locally at the facility in Rancho Bernardo.

VanBrabant said, "One of the key concepts behind Fire Scout is that a commander doesn't have to put a large aircraft or pilot in the air to do the same job."

Navy surface ships usually deploy with a detatchment of SH-60 or MH-60 helicopters. What Northrop-Grumman and the Navy intend to find out is if Fire Scout -- which will ultimately be placed on the Navy's newest ship, the LCS, or Littoral Combat Ship -- can do mundane things so pilots don't have to.

"It's that dull mission in the middle of the night where you have to watch a piece of the ocean or a mountain pass where you don't necessarily need an F-18 or a manned helicopter just circling," VanBrabant said.

The Fire Scout can fly 110 miles from a ship and stay circling for five hours while sending back real-time information.

While the Navy's version at the moment isn't armed the Army is looking at taking one into the field that definitely packs a punch.

For now, Fire Scout will be aboard the USS McInerney when it deploys for a counter-drug mission in the Caribbean in about a month.

The deployment in October will be critical for the company. How it performs and what it's able to see and do may determine just how many versions are ordered.

From TheStrategyPage

Rebuilding Carriers

July 8, 2009: The USS Carl Vinson, a Nimitz class carrier, just completed its mid-life refueling and overhaul. This is a three year process, and cost $3 billion. Part of that involved reloading the nuclear reactors, which  requires dismantling part of the ship, as does many of the upgrades and replacements done to electrical and mechanical systems. In effect, the ship is largely rebuilt, enabling it to serve for another 25 years.

The Vinson entered service in 1982, and is scheduled to retire in 2032. But this isn't the only time a Nimitz undergoes scheduled shipyard maintenance. During a half century of service, there are three other trips to the dry dock, and a dozen other shorter stays in the shipyard. But the midlife work is the most expensive, and takes the longest. All this is necessary to keep the carrier up to date in terms of technology, and deal with wear and tear. Other warships undergo similar periods of maintenance, but the nuclear boats all require the mid-life refueling. However, a new generation of naval reactors do not require a complex midlife refueling. These reactors are already being used in the Seawolf and Virginia class subs, as well as the new Ford class carriers.

AND ----------

Northrop To Overhaul Carrier Roosevelt For $2.4B

(NORFOLK VIRGINIAN-PILOT 27 AUG 09) ... Robert McCabe

The Navy has awarded Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding in Newport News a $2.4 billion contract for a major overhaul of the Theodore Roosevelt, a nuclear-powered carrier.

The work includes the re-fueling of the ship's reactors, as well as extensive modernization work to more than 2,300 compartments, 600 tanks and hundreds of systems.

In addition, major upgrades will be made to the flight deck, catapults, combat systems and the carrier's "island."

"During this large and complex project, we'll touch almost every part of the ship," said Jim Hughes, Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding's vice president of aircraft carrier overhaul and fleet support.

The "refueling and complex overhaul" is performed once in a carrier's life span. The process is intended to extend the life of a carrier by 25 years, to its 50-year mark.

The Roosevelt is the fourth ship in the Nimitz class to undergo such an overhaul. Built by Northrop Grumman, it was launched in 1984 and delivered to the Navy in 1986.

The Roosevelt is scheduled to arrive at the shipyard this month.

Work is expected to be completed by February 2013.

 

AND…………….

USS Theodore Roosevelt Transitions to Newport News Shipyard for Complex Overhaul
Story Number: NNS090901-18
9/1/2009

By Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class (SW) Nathan L. Lockwood, USS Theodore Roosevelt Public Affairs

NEWPORT NEWS, Va. (NNS) -- USS Theodore Roosevelt (TR) (CVN 71) made the move across the James River Aug. 29 to Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding in Newport News to begin the aircraft carrier's scheduled Refueling Complex Overhaul (RCOH).

During the "dead-stick" move, Sailors on the ship's bridge maneuvered the ship while it was moved by tugs en route to a dry-dock at the shipyard where it was built and commissioned nearly 25 years ago.

"RCOH is an important process for the life-span of the ship that will require the combined efforts of the shipyard and the Sailors to finish on time," said TR's commanding officer, Capt. Ladd Wheeler. "I am confident that the 'Big Stick' will complete this yard period safely and efficiently and return to the fleet in the coming years ready for full service."

A multi-year overhaul, RCOH involves the alterations, repair, maintenance, and refueling of the aircraft carrier. The RCOH enables the ship to meet future mission and continue service life requirements for approximately the next 25 years. USS Theodore Roosevelt is the fourth Nimitz-class aircraft carrier to participate in the RCOH at Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding.

Shortly after returning to Naval Station Norfolk on April 18, the ship began the process of preparing the ship for the transit to Newport News. This included making cuts in the ship's hull to accommodate removal and replacement of major ship components.

TR, along with embarked Carrier Air Wing (CVW) 8 and Carrier Strike Group (CSG) 2, completed a seven-and-a-half month deployment in April during which they deployed to the Gulf of Oman in support of Operation Enduring Freedom. The ship also made a historic visit to Cape Town, South Africa, and a port call in Portsmouth, England.

After successful completion of all mission requirements Theodore Roosevelt arrived at Naval Station Norfolk on May 30 and began the transition period from an operational front-line, surge capable aircraft carrier into a complex maintenance period where just about every space will undergo refurbishment to sustain the next 25 years of service. Referred to as the "Smart Start" period, Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding and other maintenance activities were able to get a jump start and prepare TR for entering drydock.

"The Smart Start period allowed the crew and the shipyard to begin building the foundation work on a successful RCOH," according to Cmdr. Gunter Braun, TR's chief engineer. "Based on the results the foundation for success is well-rooted."

Theodore Roosevelt, a Nimitz-class aircraft carrier, was commissioned Oct. 25, 1986. The 1,092-foot ship weighs 101,000 tons and carries a crew of approximately 3,200.

 

Return to index

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The Next Naval Aviation Revolution

July 15, 2009: The U.S. Navy is hard at work preparing its X-47B unmanned carrier aircraft, for carrier operations. The new UAV is being put together using, literally, some proven components. This includes the tail hook from the retired F-14, the same tires used on the retired S-3, the brakes used on the F-18 and generators used in the F-22. The X-47B weighs the same as the F-18. The navy plans to use the X-47B for reconnaissance, surveillance and targeting. But it also has two internal bays holding two tons of smart bombs. Many naval officers believe that eventually, once it proves it can operate off a carrier, the X-47B will be used for a lot of bombing. Sort of a super-Predator. The navy has been impressed with the success of the Predator. The 15 ton X-47B has a wingspan of 62 feet (whose outer 15 foot portions fold up to save space on the carrier). It uses a F100-PW-220 engine, which is currently used in the F-16 and F-15.

Many naval aviators have noted how a few UAVs can maintain 24/7 observation over a lot of real estate. That's persistent observation, and it is a big advantage in combat. The submarine and surface warfare communities in the navy are eager to get that. The marines were already seeing persistence in action, when they served in Iraq and Afghanistan. The submariners liked the idea of long range, persistent, UAVs scouting way ahead for them. Then there is the prospect of one-way UAVs that could be launched from a torpedo tube. Suddenly, with UAVs, there are all manner of new possibilities. But it was the carrier community that finally saw the future. The persistent, much longer ranged, UAVs can keep carriers safer, and enable carrier aviation to strike targets much farther away.

Earlier this year, the U.S. Navy  rolled out the X-47B, its first combat UAV (or UCAS, for Joint Unmanned Combat Aerial System). This is part of a six year long, $636 million contract to build and test two X-47B aircraft. The test program calls for first flight later this year, and first carrier operations by 2011. The navy believes that, with aerial refueling, a X-47B can stay aloft for fifty hours. With internal fuel, it can go 2,700 kilometers and return to its carrier. This greatly expands the reconnaissance capability of a carrier.

Five years ago, the X-47A UCAV made its first flight. Development of this aircraft began in 2001. The Air Force was also testing the X-45 UCAV, which also had a naval version (the X-46). The X-45 program began in 1999, and the eight ton (max takeoff weight, with two ton payload) aircraft was ready for operational tests in 2006. The X-46 has a different wing layout, and a range of 1,100 kilometers, carrying a payload of two tons. The X-47A also has a two ton payload and a range of 1,600 kilometers. Unlike the X-45, which is built to be stored for long periods, the X-47A was built for sustained use aboard a carrier. All of these aircraft are very stealthy and can operate completely on their own (including landing and takeoff, under software control). The UCAVs would also be used for dangerous missions, like destroying enemy air defenses, and reconnaissance where enemy air defenses were strong.

The navy has developed auto-pilot software for landing the X-47B on a carrier. In over 10,000 simulations, under a wide variety of sea and wind conditions, the software has never failed to get the X-47B safely down. This is the same simulation software used to test changes to manned aircraft, and has proven very realistic in predicting the performance of the F-18. The navy is confident that the X-47B will be successfully taking off and landing on carriers within two years.

 

Return to index

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Raytheon Gets Nearly $19M US Navy Order

(ASSOCIATED PRESS 27 AUG 09)

WASHINGTON -- A unit of Raytheon Co. received a nearly $19 million order from the Navy to buy 38 radar upgrade kits for F/A-18D aircraft used by the Marine Corps, the Pentagon said late Wednesday.

Work will be performed in Forest, Miss.; El Segundo, Calif.; and other locations. It is expected to be completed by March 2012.

Shares of the Waltham, Mass., company rose 7 cents to $47.67 in midday trading Thursday.

Return to index

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 

TEXAN to Whiting

Whiting Welcomes New Training Planes

New Generation Of Training Craft Is Christened

(PENSACOLA NEWS JOURNAL 28 AUG 09) ... Louis Cooper


 

  Because cracked champagne bottles leave marks, streams of water from two fire trucks christened the arrival of the Navy's newest generation of training aircraft at Whiting Field Naval Air Station on Thursday.

Whiting's Training Air Wing 5 took delivery of its first two T-6B Texan II training aircraft, which will replace the T-34 Turbo Mentor. The Navy has used the older craft since 1978.

About 200 people gathered at a hangar to welcome the new arrivals. The new planes cost $5.5 million each.

"Modern aerial combat is a very complex business" said Rear Adm. Mark Guadagnini, chief of the Naval Air Training Command. "There are systems that come from space. There are systems that come from off-board. ... And there are systems onboard the airplanes that are unlike any that have been flown before.

"To operate those systems to their fullest advantage, you need to train correctly. That's what the T-6 brings us. It brings us a digital cockpit."

The new systems will be more familiar to a generation of pilots who grew up with home computers and iPods, he said.

U.S. Coast Guard Lt. Cmdr. Dave Hoten piloted one of the two planes. He was trained on the older model.

"They're both really good airplanes," Hoten said. "The new plane has a digital avionics package that is more like commercial airliners and fleet aircraft of today, whereas the old airplane has round gauges, steam gauges, and older technology. This brings up the training aspect to the digital age."

Marine Col. John Walsh, commodore of Training Air Wing 5, was excited to get the new planes. He pointed out that the T-34 in which he trained at Whiting in 1987 is still in use today.

"You can see around here we're not big fans of the Cash for Clunkers program," Walsh said, drawing laughter from the crowd. "We like to keep things flying around here. The taxpayers buy stuff for us, we take good care of it and we put it to good use. That T-34 is getting pretty darn old, obviously."

The new plane flies at a maximum of 316 knots. The old one tops out at 280 knots.

Whiting will receive 156 planes by 2015, delivered in periodic shipments. Student pilots will begin using the new planes in April.

Return to index 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 

AFO

CNO Announces Flag Officer Assignments
Story Number: NNS090828-13
Release Date: 8/28/2009 2:52:00 PM

Special release from the U.S. Department of Defense

WASHINGTON (NNS) -- Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Gary Roughead announced today the following assignments:

Rear Adm. (lower half) Joseph P. Aucoin will be assigned as commander, Carrier Strike Group 3, Bremerton, Wash. Aucoin is currently serving as deputy director, Air Warfare Division, N88B, Office of the Chief of Naval Operations, Washington, D.C.

Rear Admiral Joseph P. Aucoin
Deputy Director, Air Warfare (N88B)

Rear Admiral Joseph P. AucoinRear Admiral Joseph P. Aucoin graduated from North Carolina State University with a bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering and received his commission through the University of North Carolina NROTC program in 1980. He was designated a naval flight officer in 1981 and reported to Fighter Squadron (VF) 101 for initial training in the F-14 Tomcat.

Aucoin served in VF-33 “Tarsiers” embarked aboard USS America (CV 66), VF-101 as an instructor, VF-84 “Jolly Rogers” embarked aboard USS Nimitz (CVN 68) and VF-41 “Black Aces” embarked aboard USS Roosevelt (CVN 71). He served as Carrier Air Wing 8 operations officer embarked aboard Roosevelt  and returned to VF-41 as commanding officer embarked aboard USS Kennedy (CV 67) and  Roosevelt. He commanded Carrier Air Wing 5 forward deployed in Japan and embarked aboard USS Kitty Hawk (CV 63).

Ashore, he has served in the Program Planning and Development Branch (N801), OPNAV Staff; Programming and Budget Division (PBAD), J8, Joint Staff; Aviation Strike Warfare Requirements (N880); Head, Program Planning and Development Branch (N801); Head, Maritime, Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Aviation Training Plans and Programs (N882). Aucoin reported back to N88 in September 2007 and is currently serving as deputy director, Air Warfare (N88B).

Aucoin has accumulated more than 4700 hours and more than 1300 carrier arrested landings. His personal awards include the Silver Star, the Legion of Merit, the Distinguished Flying Cross with V and Bronze Stars. He is an Arthur S. Moreau Scholar and holds masters degrees in Public Administration from Harvard University and in National Security Studies and Strategic Affairs from the Naval War College.



Rear Adm. (lower half) Joseph P. Mulloy will be assigned as director, Office of Budget, Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Financial Management and Comptroller/director, Fiscal Management Division, N82, Office of the Chief of Naval Operations, Washington, D.C. Mulloy is currently assigned as director, Programming Division, N80, Office of the Chief of Naval Operations, Washington, D.C.  (SWO)

Rear Adm. (lower half) Mark A. Vance, who has been selected for promotion to rear admiral, will be assigned as director, Programming Division, N80, Office of the Chief of Naval Operations, Washington, D.C. Vance is currently serving as commander, Carrier Strike Group 3, Bremerton, Wash.

Rear Admiral Mark A. Vance
Commander, Carrier Strike Group 3
Commander, John C. Stennis Strike Group

Rear Admiral  Mark A. VanceA native of Billings, Mont., Rear Admiral Mark Vance graduated from the University of Idaho in May 1980. In 1981 he received his Naval Flight Officer wings and reported to Fighter Squadron 101 for training in the F-14 Tomcat. He has earned graduate degrees in Systems Management from the University of Southern California in 1988, and the Naval War College in Newport, R.I. in 2001.

Vance’s fleet assignments include deployments from both coasts in Fighter Squadron 84 embarked aboard USS Nimitz (CVN 68); Fighter Squadron 154 embarked aboard USS Constellation (CV 64) and USS Independence (CV 62); commanding officer, Fighter Squadron 11 embarked aboard USS Carl Vinson (CVN 70) and USS John C. Stennis (CVN 74), and commander, Carrier Air Wing 3 embarked aboard USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75) during Operation Iraqi Freedom. Vance’s shore assignments include Air Test and Evaluation Squadron 4 in Point Mugu, Calif., Naval Strike and Air Warfare Center in Fallon, Nev., U.S. Space Command in Colorado Springs, Colo., air operations officer for Commander, 2nd Fleet and chief of staff for Commander, 5th Fleet.

In December 2005, Vance reported as deputy director of Deep Blue. In March 2006, he assumed duties as acting director of Deep Blue. Vance served as associate director, Assessment Division (N81D) from November 2006 through September 2008. He assumed duties as commander, Carrier Strike Group 3 and commander, John C. Stennis Strike Group in September 2008.

Vance’s awards include the Legion of Merit (4), Bronze Star, Defense Meritorious Service Medal, Meritorious Service Medal (2), Air Medal (3) with Combat “V”, Strike/Fight Medal (3), Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medal (2) with Combat “V”, Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal (2) and various other campaign and service awards. Vance is the recipient of the Tail Hooker of the year award for 2004. He has accumulated over 4000 accident-free hours in various Navy jets, including over 3,500 hours in the F-14 Tomcat.


Rear Adm. (lower half) Richard C. Vinci will be assigned as chief, Navy Dental Corps/deputy chief of staff for installations and logistics, M4, Bureau of Medicine and Surgery, Washington, D.C. Vinci is currently serving as chief, Navy Dental Corps/commander, Navy Medicine Support Command, Jacksonville, Fla.

Capt. David B. Woods, who has been selected for promotion to rear admiral (lower half), will be assigned as director, Strategy and Policy Division, N51, Office of the Chief of Naval Operations, Washington, D.C. Woods is currently serving as head of strategic planning for Navy Quadrennial Defense Review, Office of the Chief of Naval Operations, Washington, D.C.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

Calling F-35 Vital, Gates Assures Lockheed Of Military's Backing

(FORT WORTH STAR TELEGRAM 01 SEP 09)

FORT WORTH — Right on cue, an F-35 roared over Lockheed Martin on Monday morning, just as Defense Secretary Robert Gates delivered what might have been his strongest endorsement yet of the joint strike fighter.

"The F-35 is the core of our combat tactical aircraft in the future," Gates said while standing in a hangar in front of a newly built F-35 Lightning II. "My view is we cannot afford as a nation not to have this airplane."

Gates, who has summarily canceled more than a few weapons programs for cost overruns and extensive delays, arrived at the plant with thousands of employees awaiting his judgment on whether the F-35 program is worth the escalating price in a time of worsening budget pressures.

His visit to the mile-long plant — the spot where B-24 Liberators to F-16 Fighting Falcons have been assembled since the 1940s — was the first for a defense secretary since Donald Rumsfeld made in appearance in 1976, during the Ford administration.

Gates’ visit was significant to M.L. Smith, a 30-year mechanic at the facility and representative in the International Association of Machinists, and not just because he was asked to explain the integrated power package to him.

"It signals to the people on this line that our government is backing the JSF," Smith said.

Led on the factory tour by F-35 program general manager Dan Crowley, Gates was accompanied by Defense Undersecretary Ashton Carter, Lockheed CEO Robert Stevens, Lockheed Executive Vice President Ralph Heath and Marine Maj. Gen. David Heinz, the program’s executive officer.

Lockheed Martin was awarded the contract in 2001 to develop and produce the military’s next workhorse fighter/bomber.

The Pentagon intends to eventually buy more than 2,500 of the airplanes — for close to $300 billion — and field slightly different versions for the Air Force, Navy and Marines. Lockheed Martin is also counting on hundreds more sales to foreign nations.

Gates, who became defense secretary under President George W. Bush in December 2006, pushed to end production of the F-22 Raptor, also built by Lockheed Martin. He has long been a fan of the F-35, which he pointedly said would be "less than half the price" of the F-22 when it goes to full production.

"The importance of this program can hardly be overstated," Gates said. "I’m heartened by what I’ve seen this morning, especially by the commitment of the people involved in putting this airplane together."

The program is about two years behind schedule, and development has cost several billion dollars more than first anticipated. This year’s schedule of flight tests is also running several months behind.

Jon Beesley, Lockheed Martin’s chief test pilot, said the delays are minor in a program of the F-35’s scope.

"You’d always like to be ahead," Beesley said. "But when you step back and look at it from a programmatic view, we’re still in a position to execute the program."

Gates did not express concern Monday, saying that he has "a good deal of confidence in the leadership here" and that "virtually every modern tactical aircraft has had its challenges in development."

He said plans remain on track to establish an Air Force training squadron in 2011 and a Marine squadron in 2012.

"My impression is that most of the high-risk elements associated with this developmental program are largely behind us," he said. "I can’t stand here and say there won’t be further cost growth or anything like that, but I think everybody is aware of the importance both of the timelines and the execution of this program to keep the cost as low as possible."

About 7,000 employees work on the F-35 in Fort Worth, although that number will grow as the plane moves into full production. By 2016, Lockheed Martin intends to build one airplane a day.

Steve Nelson, associate manager of the forward fuselage team, also talked to Gates on Monday, demonstrating for him the accessibility of the components and the improvements in the cockpit compared with the F-16.

"His visit tells me he’s interested in the product," Nelson said.

Despite his strong endorsement of the F-35 program, Gates reiterated his opposition to development of an alternative engine, saying it would add billions of dollars in costs and further delays.

Some on Capitol Hill have been pushing for development of a General Electric and Rolls-Royce engine to serve as an alternative to the current Pratt & Whitney engine.

"At this point, where we’re trying to count every dollar ... we feel strongly that there is not a need for a second engine," he said. "The Hill has been informed that the president’s advisers would recommend a veto if that’s in the bill."

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

Navy Discussing 2014 IOC For Joint Strike Fighter Carrier Variant

(INSIDE THE NAVY 31 AUG 09) ... Dan Taylor

There are discussions among Navy leadership about shaving a full year off the initial operational capability date for the carrier variant of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, from 2015 to 2014, according to a source familiar with the JSF program.

“Nothing is definite, but there are discussions,” the source said.

Moving the IOC to the left for the F-35C would likely involve a change in the definition of IOC, he said. For example, if the IOC were defined as four squadrons deployed, officials might decide they may only need one squadron on a ship initially, which could be achieved sooner, he said. “No one’s talked about changing deliveries or any change to the program,” he said. “But in general, it’s when you have enough planes and they have enough capability you could go to war with them.”

The source added that the discussions could “live and die all in one breath,” but if the chief of naval operations signs off on it, the Navy would have a JSF on a carrier deck at its disposal sooner. Requirements officials still have to hash out exactly what the new IOC would look like and whether such a move would be realistic, he said.

“Some might say all you need is one squadron, some might say three squadrons,” he said. “Someone over in the Pentagon and Navy leadership is exploring the possibility.”

If such a move were to happen, it would be good news for a program that has been challenged by delays and cost increases across all three variants throughout the JSF’s development. With a looming strike fighter shortfall in the next decade, the Navy is depending on both the Marine Corps and Navy variants of the JSF to stay on time, and even reach the fleet early if possible. Officials have said that any delay to JSF would exacerbate the shortfall.

The Pentagon’s JSF Joint Estimate Team will meet with manufacturer Lockheed Martin in the fall to address key concerns about the program. Last year’s JET report projected the aircraft would face an additional two years of schedule delay.

In July, Lockheed Martin Aeronautics unveiled the first F-35C test aircraft, CF-1, at its headquarters in Fort Worth, TX.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 E-6B Mercury Aircraft To Undergo Refit

(UPI 31 AUG 09)

TINKER AIR FORCE BASE, Okla., -- The U.S Defense Department announced plans to begin a refit program for the Navy's E-6B Mercury airborne strategic command aircraft.

The E-6B aircraft, operated by the Strategic Communications Wing One at Tinker Air Force Base in Oklahoma, will undergo upgrades from the 566th Aircraft Maintenance Squadron, the Air Force reported.

As part of the refit program, the 566th squadron will inspect and replace up to 15,000 fasteners on 16 of the Navy's Boeing-made E-6B aircraft. Officials say the refit is designed to extend the life of the aircraft by two decades.

"That's the extent of the program, but it's very labor intensive," Bill Cain, 566th Aircraft Maintenance Squadron deputy director, said in a statement.

"It will require an incredible amount of hand work to replace virtually all the wing skin fasteners."

 

Return to index

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

Enterprise Completes Second Phase Of Crew Certification

(NAVY.MIL 02 SEP 09) ... Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Jeffrey Willadsen

NEWPORT NEWS, Va. (NNS) -- The crew of the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier USS Enterprise (CVN 65) passed phase two of the Crew Certification Process (Crew Cert) Sept. 1 in preparation for getting the ship out of the shipyards and back underway.

The purpose of Crew Cert is to ensure the ship's Sailors are knowledgeable of the fundamentals of shipboard life and have a baseline level of knowledge that can be applied across all ratings.

"Crew Cert is designed to make sure that all hands can play their significant roles in getting this warship out of the yards and back into the fight where she belongs," said Chief Operations Specialist (SW/SS) Brian Wemmerus, Enterprise Training Department's leading chief petty officer.

The test is a series of examinations, both written and oral, designed to assess the crew's ability to fight and protect the ship. The topics vary widely but cover all aspects of the ship's daily and emergency functions, including maintenance, damage control, navigation, operations, and watchstanding.

Crew Cert consists of three phases, the first of which was completed in July. Phase two contains some of Crew Cert's most important segments including grading items such as developing the ship's training plans, watchstander interviews in a wide variety of positions, administrative audits of the Standard Organization and Regulations Manual, watch, quarter and station bill, rules of the nautical road testing for appropriate watchstanders, flight-deck handling procedures; and auxiliary engineering practices.

"Phase three is scheduled during fast cruise to test the ship's abilities in a simulated underway environment," said Wemmerus. "The whole purpose of the process is the gradual buildup of skill sets that are degraded by this time in the shipyard and to get everyone back up to speed."

The certification is geared toward ensuring that all Sailors are able to demonstrate their capability to respond to dangers in different scenarios.

"Crew Certification affects every Sailor aboard," said Wemmerus. "All Enterprise Sailors played a vital role in our success."

Enterprise is currently undergoing a maintenance period in the Northrop Grumman Newport News Shipyard and training to maintain proficiency in preparation to return to the fleet.

Return to index

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

ASN I&E

BJ Penn Retires After More than Four Decades of Service

Release Date: 9/3/2009 4:45:00 PM

By Lt. j.g. Laura Stegherr, Navy Office of Information

WASHINGTON (NNS) -- The assistant secretary of the Navy for installations and environment (ASN I&E), retired from civilian service Sept. 3 after more than four years as the leader of the Department of the Navy's shore establishment and three months as acting secretary of the Navy.

BJ Penn, ASN I&E credits his previous three decades for his success.

Penn's journey began as a seaman recruit when he enlisted in the Navy in 1961. He went on to earn his wings as a naval aviator, serve as both the executive officer and commanding officer of VAQ-33 and as air boss on the USS America.

"Every aviator wants to then be the commander officer of an aircraft carrier," said Penn. "However, I didn't screen for a carrier, I got Naval Air Station North Island, which was phenomenal, because at the time it was the Navy's largest air station. Everything I did during my time at the air station is what prepared me so greatly for this job."

During his tenure as ASN (I&E), Penn was responsible for the management of the Department's shore infrastructure, which encompasses 102 installations and 72,500 facilities valued at over $215 billion. This position carried with it several new and complex responsibilities - ensuring the Department was environmentally compliant, energy efficient, and was supported by a force with a high quality of life.

"To relocate forces to Guam, we are doing 85 different environmental studies," said Penn. "It's going to take us about three years at a major cost. But we have to do the right thing – if we don't take care of the environment, we are doing ourselves a disservice as well as the rest of the world."

Penn also noted how the Department's mission is expanding with the DoN's efforts as a leader in energy efficiency.

"We are striving to green the Navy. All of our new construction projects are going to be green, LEED certified buildings. The result in cost savings and for the environment will be unbelievable."

Above all, Penn emphasized that the quality of life for Sailors and Marines is the most important part of his job.

"I was just in Miramar a month or so ago looking at the new private-public venture housing, which is fantastic. With our Homeport Ashore Program, we've opened up apartments for Sailors in San Diego, and we're building 36 new barracks for the Marines over the next few years. That is what we are doing for our people, and I think that's the right thing to do."

In an award ceremony for Penn Aug. 31 at the Navy Memorial, Vice Adm. Michael Loose, deputy chief of Naval Operations for Fleet Readiness and Logistics, praised Penn's leadership and his contributions to the Navy.
"You leave a legacy of being a phenomenal and inspirational teacher, coach, mentor and team builder who would selflessly do anything for a shipmate or a friend," said Loose. "You did what you said you would do – you not only visited every single one of the Navy's and Marine Corps' 102 bases, but you made a significant impact on the people you visited. And from every one of those visits, you brought back the issues that meant the most to our Sailors, Marines and their families."

Looking back at his life, Penn reflected that his time in the Navy has truly been an incredible journey. "If you want to make it, you certainly can in the Navy. Every day I pinch myself. Where else can a kid from Peru, Indiana come in as an E-1 in the Navy, fulfill a childhood dream of flying jets, serve with the best people in the world and even act as the Secretary of the Navy? It's truly the American dream."                                                                                                  

 

 

 

 

HOME | ABOUT US | NAVAL AVIATION FORCES | EVENTS | SPECIAL ARTICLES

 2550 Huntington Ave, Suite 202 - Alexandria, Virginia 22303-1499
  Directions to ANA Headquarters
 Phone (703) 960-6806 - Fax (703) 960-6807

  Email
anahqtr@aol.com with questions or comments about the Association.

  Copyright © ACS Web Services
  Revised: May 03, 2010